Jump to content

SPAMFOLIO… Post here the link of spammy portfolios you find on Shutterstock


Recommended Posts

Post here all spamfolios you can find on the Shutterstock site 

Here, for example, why to allow all the possible pairs, when one image for each country could be enough, and then the customer can choose the couple of images he needs and put them together?

https://www.shutterstock.com/g/ayaz.ck?page=1&section=1&sort=newest&search_source=base_gallery&language=en

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You don’t sound at all pedantic. You do, however, sound like an arrogant, obnoxious, bully. 

Good Morning I have been a contributor for shutterstock since 2010. Recently, I discovered that one of my vectors was copied by another suspicious contributor. Anybody can help? This is my

Posted Images

LOL  and only LOL   LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL 

 

 LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL  LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL 

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, geogif said:

There is no point in portfolios like that one.

Unless if rummors about how Shutterstock usinng controlled revenue system based on portfolio size are true.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MaDedee said:

It seems that rejection reasons are not the same for all contributors.

                                                                                                 " Similar Content: This image is too similar to another image that has already been submitted or published. "

Yes, this is total bullshi!

Some of us get rejections for uploading two similar images, and here are dozens of not just similar but basically identical ones. What gives?

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Mark Godden said:

Quite depressing actually.

Yes, depressing - I'd rather be pretty unsuccessful albeit with a few images I at least feel good about than having thousands of images which seem to have been made in a frenzy or obsession. Can't really believe though these kind of portfolio's bring in any substantial money - the opposite I think: I suspect months without a single download. Which amount to an hourly rate of cents.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, J. Quendag said:

Can't really believe though these kind of portfolio's bring in any substantial money - the opposite I think: I suspect months without a single download.

That's not the problem. The problem is that these spamfolios by sheer volume will manage to clog up page after page of the search results, until the buyer gets frustrated and either goes away or buys one of those just to be done with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Simone Hogan said:

That's not the problem. The problem is that these spamfolios by sheer volume will manage to clog up page after page of the search results, until the buyer gets frustrated and either goes away or buys one of those just to be done with it.

Seems this can be easily solved by SS by giving customers an ability to ignore/block contributors from their own search results (whether permanent or during that particular search session). One click and you filter out all the spam from the given contributor.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Simone Hogan said:

That's not the problem. The problem is that these spamfolios by sheer volume will manage to clog up page after page of the search results, until the buyer gets frustrated and either goes away or buys one of those just to be done with it.

That's a dim view of the quality of the search algorithms, and the intelligence of buyers. Yet: when I did a test, and searched for 'beautiful seaside clouds' - the latest great series of images by serhiiparkhomenko, I got half a page of 'real' images, than some hundred pages of our beloved contributor from Poland, and then some more 'real' images. So: you are right, the search algorithm is not intelligent enough to counter this nonsense. All these images of the glorious sun have the same title, and keywords. One suspects an automated process. Maybe an upload by FTP and an 'accomplicing' act somewhere within (the partners maybe) of Shutterstock? But to what end? To get a subscription for 750 images a months, when fully executed, might result in more earnings for the contributor than the costs of the subscription? Or: downloads by a dishonest employee within a firm that has a sort of corporate plan to download loads of images?* And to avoid triggers when an image is downloaded to often by the same buyer, these large number of similar images, each with an unique id? That would also account for the fact that these images end up relatively high within the search results - because they are downloaded often. Would that be the scam? Or is it just someone with an obsession? There has to be an explanation - it would seem impossible to fool the reviewers to this extend, however cleverly you spread the submissions.

 

**I remember a story of a person who did some cleaning of an office. He registered a 'toll-phone line' (do not know the exact English phrase) for which, when you call it, you're charged say a dollar a minute. Than, before leaving the office as the last person, he would dial his own number, than leave the phone so that it would keep on calling all night.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, J. Quendag said:

Yes, depressing - I'd rather be pretty unsuccessful albeit with a few images I at least feel good about than having thousands of images which seem to have been made in a frenzy or obsession. Can't really believe though these kind of portfolio's bring in any substantial money - the opposite I think: I suspect months without a single download. Which amount to an hourly rate of cents.

 

Real question is not why those "persons" upload crap like this and how much they earn from it. Real question is why it is accepted by SS ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, MaDedee said:

 

Real question is not why those "persons" upload crap like this and how much they earn from it. Real question is why it is accepted by SS ? 

most likely because Photo reviewers earn bonuses from QTY reviewed, and to earn more they CHEAT and spend not 1 hour, but just 2 seconds "Choose all - click - accept"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...