Jump to content

New earnings structure for Contributors


Recommended Posts

You must be kidding?! 10 cent per image by subscription from January?! I wonder, how many really worth contributors remain with you?! Partnership - it is definitely NOT. If it is what going to happen on the 1st of January my portfolio will also be deactivated. You are not alone at photostock market. Good luck with your greedy policy!...

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

In an email that is going out today, we are announcing that we will be updating the earnings structure that determines how much you get paid when customers license your work. We are making this adjust

This is just a joke. 10 years with SS and now I'll be getting 20% commission on my footage clips??? No lifetime sales tier, just what you sold last year/this year.... To get to the curr

This space will be updated to address frequently asked questions.  My email shows different counts for videos than are shown above. Which is correct? Apologies. The email to video contributo

Posted Images

1 minute ago, Maxal Tamor said:

Even if it was 2,500,000 it would change nothing.

The big companies don't give a damn about our petitions...

But if we stop uploading new content to unfair sites, and focus all our energy on uploading new content to fair sites it will make a difference.
And opt out from video/photos, especially videos on my part.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Angel La Canfora said:

The company is worth a billion dollars. I'm sure they knew contributors would be unhappy about this but probably figured they'd gain new contributors anyway. We are expendable to them. 

The market is flooded with photos and photographers. I think if someone wants to make decent money at it, you'll have to branch out on your own, find your niche. Be your own Shutterstock. 

exactly! start your own shop! Use your creativity to its full extend!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've always said..if you want the price of the iPhone to drop, find a way to make Apple buyers to stop buying apple for a year or two and see what happens....the people can do anything and everything if they unite...but it never happens ..and let s not get political here

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Maxal Tamor said:

Even if it were 2,500,000, it would not change anything.

The big companies don't give a damn about our petitions...

Doing nothing is for sure not better and internet outrage DO work sometimes. Alamy partly cancel their commission cut lately and Facebook tried a few times to steal copyright of stuff you upload there but had to give up thanks to public outrage. BTW, I did sign the petition, but how giving money helps it and where does it go???

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Olga_i said:

They have no idea. Once they decided to ruin our incomes, best authors will leave them. I'm not sure about how claimed they will be without high quality content. Who are they without artists and photographers? Just another one platform.

May that's the goal? They think they already have enough content. And they don't want just say f** off! So they do that in their way, - just show that it will not worse time to upload to SS anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I urge every day during the week to call, write feedback, write e-mail to all managers for all possible 15-20 to report our disagreement. In order not to load the servers, everyone should call and send a letter from 11:00-12:00 and 15: 00-16:00 of his time zone. We use the official contacts provided and therefore do not commit anything illegal. If they cannot answer everyone this is their negligence.

1) they will know that we are people, not the numbers in the statistics,

2) they will know that we are not small as it seems.

I wrote in more detail before:
https://forums.submit.shutterstock.com/topic/100133-new-earnings-structure-for-contributors/?do=findComment&comment=1842445

Sorry for the bad english.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, BobNoah said:

This evil system was copied from 123RF. They are a low-tier earning agency for most contributors at least. 

My dad always taught me to imitate the best ideas not the worse ones. I don't know who taught SS

Here is an image

 

Screen Shot 2020-05-27 at 8.36.30 PM.png

123rf they make a rating for the last year. And they not reset it to zero every January 1st.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think management will listen to these cries of us. The won't reverse it because management does not listen to their workers. Even if workers strike they hardly ever listen.

why? Because they have to be right. And if a worker knows better then why do we need management?

So we end up in te situation of extremes. Either you bend the knee and accept this.

Or you fight back by ending your account. If enough of us do this, then Shutterstock will fall.

If they survive and thrive then you will know you were worthless to begin with and that you should do something else instead of making worthless images and videos.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DIRK VAN DER VEN MEDIA said:

I don't think management will listen to these cries of us. The won't reverse it because management does not listen to their workers. Even if workers strike they hardly ever listen.

why? Because they have to be right. And if a worker knows better then why do we need management?

So we end up in te situation of extremes. Either you bend the knee and accept this.

Or you fight back by ending your account. If enough of us do this, then Shutterstock will fall.

If they survive and thrive then you will know you were worthless to begin with and that you should do something else instead of making worthless images and videos.

Shutterstock will sink down. We can not do anything with that. They will pay less, and they will got less quality content, and customers will not be able to find what they want in tons of trash, urrelevant cheap content. All we can do, just straight our foots at another path.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Przemek Iciak said:

Its not just the India, and "cheap authors" in many cases are way better in what they create than many "not cheap" ones. 

When I say "cheap authors from India", I do not mean bad performers, but people who are satisfied with lower wages compared to American authors, for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why everyone is recommending Adobe. Don't get me wrong. I love Adobe. But you can't set your own prices. they still pay less than the 40% non exclusive at Pond5 and nothing beats the exclusive programme at Pond5. Why does no one recommend Pond5??? And Pond5 and Adobe work together!!! Sell through Pond5 at Adobe and you earn more than selling directly at Adobe... HELLO. Oooh and for buyers they have the best indemnification. You can sell any type of video ar image (including vectors). And Shutterstock was a good income for me, but it really does not beat pond5. Adobe is nice a third, but dwarfs next to pond5. All the others pocket money. I know my path. If only one agency survives, so be it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DIRK VAN DER VEN MEDIA said:

I don't understand why everyone is recommending Adobe. Don't get me wrong. I love Adobe. But you can't set your own prices. they still pay less than the 40% non exclusive at Pond5 and nothing beats the exclusive programme at Pond5. Why does no one recommend Pond5??? And Pond5 and Adobe work together!!! Sell through Pond5 at Adobe and you earn more than selling directly at Adobe... HELLO. Oooh and for buyers they have the best indemnification. You can sell any type of video ar image (including vectors). And Shutterstock was a good income for me, but it really does not beat pond5. Adobe is nice a third, but dwarfs next to pond5. All the others pocket money. I know my path. If only one agency survives, so be it.

Agree!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

We are making this adjustment in order to reflect changes in the market for creative content, help to create fair opportunities for all our contributors...

Let Shutterstock first exert itself and ensure fair file approving. No more strange or stupid rejects, when a clear photo is called 'out of focus', and the original vector image is called 'too similar'. And stop to approve the real trash! 

Even high-quality and relevant content is simply lost in a huge database, which got full of bad images because of cancellation of the exam and quality standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Amlan Mathur said:

PLEASE DO THIS NOW

One quick thing, give SS and SS contributor app a 1 star review, lets send their rating to hell.

Do leave a review mentioning

On May 26th Shutterstock suddenly gave its contributors a 6 day notice that they would cut their earning by 60%. They sent an unclear, haphazard communication (with one correction mail hours later) on how they would screw over the very people who make the content you love.

Buyers : Please take your business to Adobestock, their fair payouts mean you'll always have beautiful up to date images

Contributors : Disable your portfolio on 1st Jun and send a mail to Adobe telling that you've done so. Ensure you spread the word. 

DONE !

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, oleskalashnik said:

Let Shutterstock first exert himself and ensure fair file approving. No more strange or stupid rejects, when a clear photo is called 'out of focus', and the original vector image is called 'too similar'. And stop to approve the real trash!

I really thought only I had those problems

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...