Jump to content

New earnings structure for Contributors


Recommended Posts

It seem strange to have to disable javascrip to send messages...

I have not completely turned off my portfolio but have no more uploaded images..
Sales on SS are decreasing.
Sales on other sites like AS, AL or DT seem to me stable, but it is difficult to establish how much it may depend by Codiv.
Probably some category of pictures may be more penalized respect others.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

In an email that is going out today, we are announcing that we will be updating the earnings structure that determines how much you get paid when customers license your work. We are making this adjust

This is just a joke. 10 years with SS and now I'll be getting 20% commission on my footage clips??? No lifetime sales tier, just what you sold last year/this year.... To get to the curr

This space will be updated to address frequently asked questions.  My email shows different counts for videos than are shown above. Which is correct? Apologies. The email to video contributo

Posted Images

Don Landwehrle said BTW. If you're greyed out from posting here do the following.

Get to this page.
Disable Javascript.
Reload page.
Post.
Reenable Javascript.

Let's see how long this post remains!!! WELL DONE THAT MAN> I WAS GREYED OUT>

i am becoming weary of these paltry and insulting 10c earnings per download etc. I have no delusions of grandeur about my portfolio. Is it possible to disable without deleting my images. Is it possible to disable individual images without deleting. I quite simply want to keep my options open. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Giambattista Lazazzera said:

From June 1st to today I have exceeded 100 downloads. I should now be at level 2. Why are my photos still getting paid 10 cents?

 

38 minutes ago, Ints Vikmanis said:

You will always get 0.10 $. No matter of your "level"

That is true. No matter of your "level" you will always get 0.10$. Read all this topic carefully. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ints Vikmanis said:

My friend works in agency with SS 750 subscription (yearly upfront). This month they have used only 23 downloads. So real costs for one download is 6.16 EUR + TAX. Contributor will get only 0.10 USD.

 

 

Screen Shot 2020-07-28 at 14.09.58.png

I would be very interested to know if the friend's agency has ever used all 750 downloads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks to me like friend's sub account has used 27 downloads of 750 possible in one day.....month end is 27th August not July. Maybe they use around 600 of the 750/month which is still a good deal for SS as SS only has to pay out $60 to contributors. In the old system it might have had to pay out 600 X $0.38 = $228.00 which is more than that subscription deal cost even with 150 dls left unused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from the ShutterStock Inc (SSTK) Q2 2020 Earnings Call Transcript:

The report suggests that SS did better than was forecast with a higher revenue per download, 

That comes in part by turning to AI for ingesting the material supplied by contributors and also the huge reduction in what SS is now paying contributors. I do not see any reference in the report that SS is now paying contributors significantly less than what was paid out previously and that makes for a very distorted bottom line. That bottom line is not sustainable when a business shows no consideration for the suppliers of the material upon which the business was built. I have to wonder just how many contributors will be happy continuing to supply new material and have it return the minimum of just 10 cents.  

This is a temporary reprieve for SS and it seems to me that many shareholders would be well advised to take their money and run as the share price is not sustainable going forward.

The Q3 Earnings Call will tell the true story. 

Screen Shot 2020-07-29 at 2.24.45 PM.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only imagine that such a huge increase in subscribers is due to including all those free 'ten-image packages'. Even when the subscription is cancelled whilst 'free', it still counts as  a new subscriber even though they spent nothing and all it cost SS is 10X $0.10 = $1.00max/trial. Very cheap trial too for SS.....imagine if all the free images had to be paid out at $0.38.

Link to post
Share on other sites

-Shutterstock top management: We have 340 Million images, we can make a good money giving them almost for free in partnership with other companies, as long as we don't pay the creators but peanuts.

-Shutterstock shareholders: Yeeees! Show me the money!

But there's something wrong in this reasoning: Shutterstock doesn't have any images, but the contributors are the owners.

Real owners of the work: What will you do? Make this company rich in change of nothing? Accept "whatever" is given to you? I'd better keep my pictures and show to my friends as an amateur. If I were a pro, I'd do something else with my pictures.

 

Another topic is the reviews of pictures in 2-3 minutes from submitting. Did shutterstock fire many reviewers and replaced by AI? Does shutterstock receive so few images that the reviewers are wating for them to get some comission?

 

I already said it, but shutterstock is destroying it's own busines.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Guillermo Barda said:

Another topic is the reviews of pictures in 2-3 minutes from submitting. Did shutterstock fire many reviewers and replaced by AI? Does shutterstock receive so few images that the reviewers are wating for them to get some comission?

I already said it, but shutterstock is destroying it's own busines.

the ceo (intentionally lower case!) came clean on that, admitting that reviews are done by AI. there is a thread started today on that in the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/13/2020 at 1:27 PM, Tony Dunn said:

I wish more buyers would go there after realising what SS are doing cos I've uploaded 139 images to DT but no sales.

That was very misleading on DT - I sold more than normal in June - and DID NOT receive 10% extra - I emailed and basically was told I wasn't eligible for some reason - i don't why why!!     I told them that it was misleading contributors but they didn't really reply to that!

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Yana Lesnik said:

Have a look on this report) SS pocket should be really really heavy now 🤑 🙂

123.jpg

The interesting statistic is really the 6% decline in paid downloads. I see more and more Unsplash photos around and believe this will get worse so that eventually contributors will receive less and less as microstock struggles to cope with the glut.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...