
Elliott Cowand Jr
Members-
Content Count
125 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Elliott Cowand Jr
-
Rank
Member
Recent Profile Visitors
529 profile views
-
Recently sold images have double watermark?
Elliott Cowand Jr replied to Elliott Cowand Jr's topic in Contributor Experience
My most recent sales don't have it, but it is interesting to hear you are seeing the double watermark too. -
Recently sold images have double watermark?
Elliott Cowand Jr replied to Elliott Cowand Jr's topic in Contributor Experience
On my Dashboard page, in the "Latest download " column. Clicking the thumbnail shows the double watermark for the two I copied. The other thumbnails appear normal. -
Tawrat Ferdousi Branding reacted to a post in a topic: January 2021 Sales
-
Philip Armitage reacted to a post in a topic: January 2021 Sales
-
One sale .44 cents.
-
Merrillie Redden reacted to a post in a topic: Shutterstock’s rejections are a joke
-
This is how the future will be for all stock agencies. First, they lower contributor's payout percentage. In the furture - if you don't meet a certain threshold of sales they'll charge you to host those pictures glutting up their servers. Too much content that isn't selling cost them money to store.
-
HodagMedia reacted to a post in a topic: Galleries typically take between 40 to 50 percent from the sale of artworks. Retail markup average is about 50%.
-
Doug Jensen reacted to a post in a topic: Galleries typically take between 40 to 50 percent from the sale of artworks. Retail markup average is about 50%.
-
Yes, I gave him three examples that would have had a more dramatic impact on his bottom line... He wasn't happy. Basically his arguement is this should also work because Obama got elected. We may have to walk away. Pointing out his shortcomings is starting to feel like throwing stones at a crippled dog.
-
I'm not a hater. Like Alexandre Rotenberg and Rudy Umans, I'm also just pointing out the shortcomings in your proposal. You could have saved a lot of time & discussion if you would have edited your original post to read: I want stock agencies to pay us more and I have absolutely no idea how to make them do it.
-
Doug Jensen reacted to a post in a topic: Galleries typically take between 40 to 50 percent from the sale of artworks. Retail markup average is about 50%.
-
Doug Jensen reacted to a post in a topic: Galleries typically take between 40 to 50 percent from the sale of artworks. Retail markup average is about 50%.
-
Ahh, too bad. That's a pity. Well, it's such a great idea.... In fact, I'm going to take it and expand it. Proposition: We the public are tired of paying to much for flights and demand airlines cut ticket prices by 50%. Proposition: Through a public awareness campaign we will force hospitals and drug companies to lower patient's expenses by 70%. Proposition: The dairy industry exploits our thirst and must give us free milk. I don't have a blueprint for everything yet, but because they are such noble and valuable goals, anyone who suggest they can't be done should "sta
-
Sounds great. I like the idea! You are on to something. (But artist are already aware they're being exploited. The general public aren't customers of stock agencies -so have no power to force them to change their business models.) Other than 'spreading awareness" what steps can we take that would force stock house to pay us more?
-
Studio 2 reacted to a post in a topic: Galleries typically take between 40 to 50 percent from the sale of artworks. Retail markup average is about 50%.
-
You are being very rude. You floated a proposition on a public forum to see if other contrtibutors think it is a good idea or not. Instead, you want to supress anyone who doesn't share your view. I'm not a troll and have said nothing to insult your character or intelligence. On a public chat group you have to accept not everybody is going to agree with you. I'm just trying to speak the truth.
-
You're just dreaming. Shutterstock and other agencies pay so low and reject so much because they receive many more submissions than they need. It's the law of supply and demand. Buyers will always pick the best photo from hundreds, even thousands of similar content. The majority of photos that Shutterstock hosts make no money for them, but they still have the expense of housing on their servers.
-
Shutterstock’s rejections are a joke
Elliott Cowand Jr replied to Gerald Brannon's topic in Contributor Experience
Gerald Brannon, How about this? My image of a "covid vaccine syringe" was rejected for focus and noise/film grain. I made absolutely no re-edits but only flipped it from horizontal to vertical. Presto, accepted.