Tim photo-video

I know of only two such options. I think it's not difficult to guess them. Most likely nothing will happen or will happen quietly in the first option. In the second option, the account will be closed by the site and we will see it. I do not believe in such luck of photography for all the main and related keywords in the top. Of course, there is a third option, someone very rich decided to help the photographer in life (or harm) and buys his photos from different accounts without the knowledge of the photographer. In theory, this can also be.

On the 2nd picture there is a possible coastline, sunset, silhouette, but would you buy it as a beach?

Look at the query "Tree", the first place with a mediocre tree cut!

This probably requires an explanation on the part of the trading floor, otherwise trust will be completely destroyed.

We decided to live under the motto - "not a day without glitches". Otherwise it will not be interesting to live. It is scary to imagine what kind of mess there might be in the sales system, and since this is all hidden, it is almost never solved for sure.

They do not buy pictures, they sell them (the ones that have chosen). It's like a dealer.

Your story confirms that the number of pixels is not very important for buyers. You have a lot of low-resolution photos and people have been buying from you for a long time, SOD and ODD are constantly appearing.

Thanks Rudy and Steve! I am not a professional photographer. 1) Two years ago I started uploading a small archive of my videos. 2) Then I downloaded a small archive from my phone. 3) Took an old camera with a non-removable lens. 4) A year ago I took an already inexpensive $ 350 camera with a removable lens. Therefore, for the time being, I shoot the lens of an outdated DSLR with a kit. Sometimes I use the built-in flash. At home - light from the window and made small reflectors. When traveling around the city or outside the city, it is natural light or light from lamps if this is a room. I

Please see experienced ones - how well exposed are my last shots from the photo? I was told all the time that my shots were not selling because of poor lighting. There are a number of reasons for this, but I'm wondering how things are with the latter? New photos Thanks in advance!

They were offended, because with a decrease in the percentage of deductions, the authors did not clap their hands together joyfully.

Have you described it as editorial? As a commercial photo it will not be accepted - this object is easily identified as "Salford Museum and Art gallery" by the inscription. In this case, it doesn't matter how old the building is.

I re-sent 5 pieces for verification, which were accepted 2 days ago and did not appear in the portfolio. Of these, 1 was rejected for two reasons! I'm not sure if all of them will appear this time, since the last uploaded photos still do not appear. Will these photos appear? Or should we send in cycles even approved photos?

If you only increase the exposure, then even more noise will creep into the shadows. It is necessary to simultaneously suppress the noises in the program.

If the reasons for the rejection are noises, then most likely everything is fine with selective focus. lack of light or high ISO for your camera.

1,3 - 10 2,4 - 9 Nobody here from people put 10 for 3) numbers.