JSparrow

I wonder how reset to level 1 for both images and videos every year on January 1st connected with creating fair opportunities for all our contributors, and rewarding performance with greater earnings potential. Answer: no way! This is simply unreasonable robbery of the contributors during the first months of the year !!! Theft and fraud and nothing else!

👍👍

In a couple of years, I will have to pay extra for someone to take my work! 😀

June 1st will be exactly 4 years since I work with Shutterstock. It will be a good present to return to the income level that I had on Shutterstock in the first month! 😃😃

We want to know other numbers!!! And not an endless mantra about 10c ! We want to know this immediately!

I believe that the only way out is to create a union and a strike!

Seriously? Not less than 10 cents? Or maybe ask the cotributors to pay extra for the work purchased from them? Now I get at least 36 cents for work and I think that it is very small price, but I will receive 10 cents??? Are you crazy??? And where is the win for the contributors?

I wrote in SS support, but there is no answer yet ... This is a problem with the new Shutterstock algorithm, which prevents me from accessing their own mobile application from my phone. As always, all the innovations only complicate the life of the contributors.

I have the same problem. I can’t even login to my account from my phone only from computer. Every time i try to log in from Stocksubmitter or from phone I get a message I need to change a password.

The changes are really positive, but from my point of view the map has become less informative! Looking at the map, I can’t determine whether there were new sales or not. I see only a lot of blue dots without any information. In this form, the map becomes useless! I think that you need to return the display of images on the map. Or at least highlight the last sale in a different color! PS I liked the table right of the map! 😃

👍

By the way, yes! I tried to upload file 2000x2000 px but got an error. Resolution must be greater than 2000x2000 px. And this is not "at least 4.0 megapixels".

We don't want any changes!!! You complicate, but not facilitate our work!!! I don't want to buy 10 new hard drives to store these huge files!!! There is no need to create a 4 MP EPS to have a good rasterization quality!!!

I can not understand you hold us for idiots ??? This is the same shit that you tried to shove before, but in a new package !!! You don't care about the authors !!! You don't want to reckon with their opinion! It's a shame! 1) We don't want giant EPS files!!! 2) We don't want automatic generation of JPG!!!! 3) We want metadata in JPG!!!! 4) In the end, WE DON'T WANT ANY CHANGES !!! Direct your efforts to fix numerous bugs!

There are more than 300 comments on this topic. They are all negative. And I wonder where is the feedback from Shutterstock? Where is a clear answer to the question, what will happen next? Are they deaf and blind? Or too arrogant to talk to contributors?