Jump to content

Wilm Ihlenfeld

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Wilm Ihlenfeld

  • Rank

Contact Methods

  • Website URL

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Kiel, Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

4,832 profile views
  1. But at least I took in 51% more in July than I did in June here at shutterstock. Because June was so extremely miserable.
  2. July 2020 was also already a significantly below-average month. Nevertheless, I have 141 fewer downloads and 8% less revenue in July 2021. Even 2 good SODs and a good Enhanced could not change that. The same is true for AS. I have 40 fewer downloads and 14% less revenue in July 2021 than I did in July 2020 - and that's despite having a great $90+ day in this July.
  3. Okay, I wasn't aware that he started in March 2021. I thought he started here much earlier. So you are right.
  4. Hello Thijs, now I can see the information too. As for my portfolio, the information is correct. I then looked at the information for the "one account phenomenon" portfolio. However he does it, that all his images show up at the top of the search - it obviously doesn't do much. All images get high attention, but are not or hardly downloaded. Or in other words: many views, few or no downloads. But since the images still appear at the top of the search, he has not only managed to place the images right after the upload at the top, but also that they stay there, although the algo take
  5. That‘s a fantastic sale indeed! Congrats to you!
  6. Today, the share of $0.10 sales for me was 66.6%. Level 5. The levels do not matter at all.
  7. Deb and Thijs: I still can't see this information about popularity and whether an image was used or not anywhere, unfortunately. I must have the wrong browsers. So I can't check if it's true what you see there. Maybe this information is generated from a view/download ratio. Or maybe images sold through an API or partner agency can't be captured by the "AI". I don't know. But it's true: more transparency and information for the contributors - shutterstock's capital - would be fair. But they don‘t care.
  8. One contributor proclaimed at that time that contributors with a "piddly tiny portfolio" who don't have several thousand images in their portfolio don't have a clue about the microstock business, statistics, numbers, downloads and success, and therefore had better keep their mouths shut. Ultimately, it was about the age-old debate about quality vs. quantity. But that belongs to the past and does not need to be revived now.
  9. This reminds me of endless discussions in the past. Anyone with less than 10,000 images in their portfolio was denied the right to have a say. At least this is a source of information that offers interesting insights.
  10. I had two ODs for $0,10 several weeks ago. Both at Level 5. In March I had one for $0,15, too.
  11. Currently I have over 100 downloads less compared to July 2020 up to 25.07.
  12. This is exactly what I wanted to write, too, Steve. It can‘t be true what‘s going on here!
  13. Looking at the portfolios of those guys who uploaded your video, I can see this: https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-1057908982-top-view-forest-mixed-green-conifers-deciduous https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-1062851128-cloud-nature-green-landscape-rain https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-1062886573-beautiful-nature-view-stock-video and https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-1067149834-luminous-white-wireframe-body-rotating https://www.shutterstock.com/de/video/clip-1059125087-video-bust-figure-technology-advance https://www.
  14. Incredible! This can't be true! And that there is a file without author is incredible as well. doodlart: I would beg you to write an e-mail to infingementclaims@shutterstock.
  • Create New...