Jump to content

oleschwander

Members
  • Content Count

    3,161
  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

About oleschwander

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Europe
  • Interests
    Photography, films, art

Contact Methods

  • Instagram
    http://instagram.com/ole_schwander/

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. David I'm sure it's 'much hadham' - but how should they know it's a location ..? I wonder by the way why you have country locations in this image ... not that it matters - except 'much hadham' which - for most people - is nonsense (I think) ...
  2. Thanks. Iโ€™m using an extremely old and unexpensive Canon DSLR and thinking of something new and smaller. Your images really stand out imo.
  3. Great images David ..! ๐Ÿ‘ I hate to ask - but which camera do you use ..?
  4. Exactly - they should never have been accepted. But SS donโ€™t care about their own rules anymore. Better to contact Darach - Shutterstock donโ€™t care. Itโ€™s way out of line that Shutterstock are selling other companies logotypes - and at the same time breaking their own rules ..!!! ๐Ÿคฎ I wonder how anyone can steal vector images. Certainly he donโ€™t trace them which is tideous . ..?
  5. No not i focus. This is the solution - and it will be accepted. ๐Ÿ˜
  6. I think I've read about that reaction before a couple of times. SS it-systems can't be trustworthy - it must be a 'technical flaw' since they couldn't spot it in the system - are the systems outdated? And how many 'flaws' are there per day? ๐Ÿฅด. It could be interesting to persue the issue and still demand a proof from DM - but - alas - for what purpose ...? But credit to you Travers for not giving up! ๐Ÿ‘
  7. Wonder if it isn't it the same company with the same staff ...?
  8. Iโ€™m sure youโ€™re right. But the Travers have to have some evidence from Daily Mail when SS claimes that itโ€™s not sold vua them. Embarrasing for SS if they are wrong and something that will not keep Daily Mail to buy images here.
  9. Looks like you're right. Be aware that 99designs on their homepage says: "We also charge a platform fee on every project to provide you with support, secure payments, fraud protection and more. " So they must be committed to help. Also the companies that have bought the designs must be furious ..! Great designs at 99designs by the way ..! ๐Ÿ˜„๐Ÿ™Œ
  10. Nice that you got an answer from SS. Then I would go for Daily Mail - a lot more profit than SS 10 cent ...! An interesting case ...
  11. Exactly. This can make a huge profit with 200 millions images.
×
×
  • Create New...