Jump to content
Ruby.jpg
 

Photo Information for Ruby.jpg

Taken with NIKON COOLPIX P900

  • 13.4 mm
  • 1/60
  • f f/5.6
  • ISO 200
View all photo EXIF information

Recommended Comments

What was the reason given? It is usually pretty accurate.

To me, it looks unsharp, and over processed. The lighting doesn't look very good either.

It also doesn't look like it has any commercial value, it simply isn't interesting enough for stock. Take a look at the 19,255 pages of cat photos already available and see how yours compares.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The reason(s) are: Content contains chrominance noise, luminance noise, sharpening noise, or film grain that detracts from the main subject.

If the reason is "no commercial value", the it should be stated in reason(s) rendered. Actually, this photos has very little processing.  I don't have an emotional attachment to the photo, just wanted another opinion.  Thanks

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

They may accept it even if no commercial value, but "content contains chrominance noise, luminance noise, sharpening noise, or film grain that detracts from the main subject" is basically the same as "over processed", one of the possible reasons I gave above.

They may have other issues with it, but once they have one reason to reject it, they are unlikely to take the time to list any additional reasons.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...